Processing math: 2%

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

Regular Normal Subgroups and Semidirect Products

Let G act transitively on Ω throughout. We shall be concerned with the case where G has a regular normal subgroup K, meaning that K acts transitively on \Omega and the stabilizer K_\alpha is trivial for every \alpha (this is the regular action, it's equivalent to the action on the cosets 1 g).

Lemma If G acts transitively on \Omega with regular normal subgroup K choose \alpha \in \Omega the action of G_\alpha on K by conjugation is equivalent to its action on \Omega with 1 \in K corresponding to \alpha \in \Omega.
proof: Define \theta : K \to \Omega by k \mapsto \alpha k. This is a bijection since K is regular. We just need to show that the two actions are equivalent: (k \theta) g = \alpha k g = \alpha g k^g = \alpha k^g = k^g \theta.

If G is multiply transitive and has a regular normal subgroup K the subgroup G_\alpha is transitive on \Omega \setminus \{\alpha\} and hence K^\# = K \setminus \{1\} as conjugation is an automorphism of a group, this means in particular that the group K ???? automorphisms ?????? ff

Lemma An automorphism preserves the order of a group element.
proof: Let \theta : G \to G be an automorphism and g have order n, then (\theta g)^i \not = 1 for any 0 < i < n since if it did \theta(g^i) = 1 implies that g^i = 1.

Proposition Let K be a group then
  1. If \operatorname{Aut} K acts transitively on K^\# then K is elementary abelian
  2. If \operatorname{Aut} K is 2-transitive on K^\# then either K \simeq C_2^s or C_3
  3. If \operatorname{Aut} K is 3-transitive on K^\# then K \simeq C_2^2
  4. \operatorname{Aut} K is not 4-transitive.
 proof: (1) Since automorphisms preserve the order of elements all elements must have the same order, and that order must be a prime otherwise there would be elements with smaller order, by Cauchy's theorem we can say this is a p-group and so Z(K) is non-trivial. In fact we know Z(K) \operatorname{char} G (because the center is preserved by conjugation) now any automorphism of K fixes a characteristic subgroup like Z(K) so for transitivity to be possible Z(K)=K. This implies K is abelian and therefore a direct product of cyclic groups, which we know must all be C_p!
(2) Since 2-transitivity implies primitivity of the action we define a relation on K^\# that is an \operatorname{Aut} K-congruence: k R k' if k=k' or k^{-1} = k'. Clearly this is an equivalence relation preserved by the action hence by primitivity it must be the equality relation (implying k^{-1} = k so the group is C_2^s) or the entire relation (implying every two non-identity elements are equal or inverse so the group will be C_3).
(3) If the group is further 3-transitive, then it's impossible that it's C_3: That's too small! Take some k \in K^\# and consider the stabilizer (\operatorname{Aut} K)_k which is 2-transitive hence primitive so again let's define a congruence on it k_1 R k_2 if k_2 = k_1 or k_2 = k k_1 - meaning that k_1,k_2 "differ by k" - this can't be the equality relation since that would imply k=1 so it's the universal relation implying K \simeq C_2^2.
(3)  This is impossible again because the group is too small.

Corollary Suppose G acts t-transitively on \Omega with a regular normal subgroup K so |\Omega| = |K| then
  1. If t=2 then K \simeq C_p^s
  2. If t=3 then K \simeq C_2^s or C_3
  3. If t=4 then K \simeq C_2^2
  4. t < 5
Proposition If (G,\Omega) is a primitive permutation group such that some G_\alpha is simple (therefore all G_\alpha are simple) then either G is simple or has a regular normal subgroup.
proof: Suppose G is not simple, then there's a K such that 1 \not = K \lhd G. In that case K \cap G_\alpha \unlhd G_\alpha is simple so K \cap G_\alpha = 1 or K \cap G_\alpha = G_\alpha but K is transitive by a corollary on primitive permutation groups and G_\alpha is a maximal subgroup by another corollary so we cannot have G_\alpha \le K (certainly G_\alpha < K can't happen, and if G = G_\alpha then \alpha g G_\alpha = \alpha g so G_\alpha = G_\beta = \ldots = G contradiction). Then K \cap G_\alpha = 1 so K is regular because it's a normal subgroup which we showed acts transitively and also it has the regular action because we saw that K_\alpha = 1.

Definition Let H,K be groups with a homomorphism \theta : H \to \operatorname Aut K. For k \in K, h \in H write k^h short for k^{h \theta}. Then the semidirect product K \rtimes H is defined as the group K \times H with binary operation:
(k_1,h_1)(k_2,h_2) = (k_1 k_2^{h_1^{-1}},h_1h_2).
proof: prove this is a group

Define subgroups of the semidirect product \tilde{K} = \{(k,1)\} and \tilde{H} = \{(1,h)\} then \tilde{K} \le K \rtimes H, \tilde{H} \le K \rtimes H, \tilde K \cap \tilde H = 1,,\tilde K \tilde H = K \rtimes H and \tilde K \unlhd K \rtimes H but we don't know that \tilde H \unlhd K \rtimes H. This is an "external" construction of the semidirect product. We also have an internal one. An extension G of K by H is such that K \lhd G, G/K \simeq H i.e. the short exact sequence 1 \longrightarrow K \longrightarrow G \longrightarrow H \longrightarrow 1 in which case we write G = K . H, the . is "neutral" meaning that it doesn't really tell you how the group has been extended.

Definition if we have a s.e.s. like above with K \unlhd G, K \cap H = 1 and KH=G we call G a split extension of K by H and write G = K:H.

Theorem If G is a split ext then define \theta : H \to \operatorname{Aut} K by k^{h \theta} = k^h. Then G \simeq K \rtimes H.

Corollary If G is transitive on \Omega with a regular normal subgroup then G = K : G_\alpha.

No comments:

Post a Comment