Processing math: 100%

Sunday, 10 March 2013

A_n is the only normal subgroup of S_n

Lemma Suppose 1NG has trivial intersection with [G,G], then it lies in the center.
proof: Let nN then ng[g,n]=g1ng[g,n]=g1gn=n and we know ngN so [g,n]N so it equals 1 so n commutes with g.

Lemma Sn for n3 has trivial center.
proof: If z lies in the center then zg=gz for all π. We show that gz=g for all g implies z=1: Take any three symbols from the group a,b,c then consider:
  • (ab)z=(azbz) so az=a,bz=b or az=b,bz=a.
  • (abc)z=(azbzcz) so (using the previous) cz=c.
Corollary For n5 the only nontrivial normal subgroup of Sn is An (since it must meet the simple group An).

Note: S4 has just one normal Klein-4 subgroup (even though it has other non-normal Klein-4 subgroups).

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Outer Automorphism of S_6

Lemma If αAut(Sn) maps transpositions to transpositions iff it's an inner automorphism.
proof: () inner automorphisms are done by conjugation which preserves cycle type. () todo

Lemma If n6 then Out(Sn)=1.
proof: An outer-automorphism must swap transpositions with some other order-2 conjugacy class. First we count cycles of type 2k1n2k. You have (nn2k) choices of fixed elements for each, then with the 2k remaining elements we can permute these in 2k! ways before factoring out the order each transposition is written in and the number of ways we order the transpositions 2kk!, therefore there are fnk=n!(2k)!(n2k)!(2k)!2kk! cycles of the given type. In particular fn1=(n2).
For n>6,k>1 fnk>(n2k)(n2) unless n=2k or 2k+1 - but in those cases prove these cases cannot occur - so there can be no outer automorphisms. For n<6 do this too.

Theorem S6 has an outer-automorphism.
proof: There are 6 S5 subgroups as point stabilizers, but from the following diagram we find an S5 that is not a point stabilizer


Permutations of the 5 colors correspond to permutations of the 6 points (which we label 1,2,3,4,5,6 clockwise starting at the top left) (redyellow)=(12)(36)(45) (bluegreen)(redpurpleyellow)=(123456).

So we have discovered an exotic S5 inside S6, I do not know why but there are 6 conjugates of it. We will call the action of S6 on these 6 conjugates ς.

gap> s5 := Group((1,2)(3,6)(4,5),(1,3,6,5,4));
Group([ (1,2)(3,6)(4,5), (1,3,6,5,4) ])
gap> ex := ConjugateSubgroups(SymmetricGroup(6),s5);
[ Group([ (1,2)(3,6)(4,5), (1,3,6,5,4) ]), 
  Group([ (1,2)(3,5)(4,6), (1,3,5,6,4) ]), 
  Group([ (1,2)(3,6)(4,5), (1,3,6,4,5) ]), 
  Group([ (1,2)(3,4)(5,6), (1,3,4,6,5) ]), 
  Group([ (1,2)(3,5)(4,6), (1,3,5,4,6) ]), 
  Group([ (1,2)(3,4)(5,6), (1,3,4,5,6) ]) ]
gap> Position(ex, ex[1]^(1,2));                     
2
gap> Position(ex, ex[2]^(1,2));
1
gap> Position(ex, ex[3]^(1,2));
4
gap> Position(ex, ex[4]^(1,2));
3
gap> Position(ex, ex[5]^(1,2));
6
gap> Position(ex, ex[6]^(1,2));
5

Note, that (12)ς=(12)(34)(56) means we have an outer automorphism! well, if we have an automorphism:

gap> Position(ex, ex[1]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
1
gap> Position(ex, ex[2]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
3
gap> Position(ex, ex[3]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
2
gap> Position(ex, ex[4]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
5
gap> Position(ex, ex[5]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
6
gap> Position(ex, ex[6]^(1,2,3,4,5,6));
4
gap> StructureDescription(Group((1,2)(3,4)(5,6),(2,3)(4,5,6)));  
"S6"

and we do.

Friday, 1 March 2013

The first 3 p-groups

Definition The equivalence relation ab iff g,ag=b partitions a group into conjugacy classes. Each elements of the center of a group is its own conjugacy class.

Proposition The number of cosets of a centralizers is the same as the number of elements of a conjugacy classes.
proof: Let C be a conjugacy class so that Cg=C for all g. Let aC then the orbit of a under the conjugacy action fills up the whole of C. The stabilizer of this action is equal to the centralizer of a so by orb-stab we have |C|=|G:CG(a)|.

Lemma Prime power order implies not centerless.
proof: Let G act on itself by conjugation, clearly Z(G) is invariant with respect to this action. We have the conjugacy class equation, where the sum runs over conjugacy class representatives |G|=|Z(G)|+g|G:CG(g)| with CG(g)={xGxG,xg=gx} being the centralizer of g. Using the fact that CG(g) is never the whole group (otherwise g commutes with everything, so it would be in the center instead) we deduce the lemma modp.

Lemma A nonabelian group can never have a nontrivial cyclic quotient.
proof: Let G/N be generated by gN so that every coset is of the form giN and so every element of the group is of the form gin. Then the group is abelian since gingjn=gi+jnn=gjngin.

Theorem |G|=p then G=Cp.
proof: Cauchy's theorem gives an element of order p, it must generate the whole group.

Theorem |G|=p2 then G=Cp2 or C2p.
proof: We know from counting conjugacy classes that |Z(G)| is p or p2 and it can't be p by the lemma (because |G/Z(G)|=p), so the group is abelian.

Theorem |G|=p3 then G is abelian or |Z(G)|=p
proof: In the non-abelian case |Z(G)| must be p or p2, but p2 cannot occur by the lemma since then |G/Z(G)|=p would be cyclic.

Classification The nonabelian groups of order 23 are D8 and Q.